Today Google opened up their priority inbox feature, which automagically prioritizes my inbox so I save time by reading the most important emails first. Brilliant!!!

Related articles by Zemanta

• Priority Inbox (tomaplomb.blogspot.com)
• Google to Roll out E-mail Prioritizing Feature in Gmail (pcworld.com)
• Gmail learns to prioritize your inbox — automatically! (downloadsquad.com)
• Google to Roll Out E-Mail Prioritizing Feature in Gmail (nytimes.com)
• Learn About Google’s Priority Inbox (markblinder.com)

Super Bowl XLIV was the most watched television show in history. 106.1 million people tuned in to see the Saints beat the Colts for the Lombardi Trophy.

We saw Google run their first ever TV ad. And we saw Danica Patrick and GoDaddy run their umpteenth awful “hot chicks unrated on our website” ad.

But, curiously, no companies used this opportunity of hundreds of millions of eyeballs to grow their SEO.

In 2007, Pontiac, encouraged users to ‘Google Pontiac’ instead of simply going to Pontiac.com.

If a company owns the Search Engine Results Page (SERP) this strategy is brilliant. Google uses preferential results now to show ads, so if you Google a keyword and click a link…that link will be more relevant to you next time you search. Pontiac would rank higher in search results for people that Googled Pontiac, clicked the link, and later searched for cars.

Successful advertising will push your target audience to take action. If they’re not going to buy a car right now, why not use the opportunity to increase the likelihood of a future purchase?

Read a more detailed account of this personalized search optimization at SEOmoz.org.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Google Super Bowl XLIV 2010 Commercial (techie-buzz.com)
• Danica Patrick Go Daddy Super Bowl Commercial 2010 (manolith.com)
• Watch Super Bowl XLIV 2010 Ads on Hulu and YouTube (techie-buzz.com)
• Personalization of Google Results Creates a Huge Advertising Opportunity (seomoz.org)

I’m a software developer. I build systems that collect and utilize user’s personal information.

As a conservative Christian that works for the political party known for fighting to protect constitutional freedoms, I believe that above my legal duties I’m responsible to use and protect this information for good and only good. No scraping, borrowing, renting lists, spamming, etc.

Watch this quick video about how a company like Google looks at privacy:

Read more about International Data Privacy Day

Related articles by Zemanta

• Google’s Privacy Principles (googleblog.blogspot.com)

Ross Douthat writes in the New York Times (Jan, 18), “For decades, they had watched their Republican rivals exploit alternative media to raise money, organize voters and whip up outrage. But the Internet was going to be different,” it was “for the young, the hip, the multicultural, the liberal. Let the G.O.P. be the party of Fox News. The Democrats would be the party of Google, YouTube and Facebook,” and “during the 2008 campaign, that’s exactly what they were.” Adds Douhat, “A year later, some of the Democrats’ advantage is still there. But it’s been crumbling ever since Obama took office.”

Read the entire article at NYTimes.com

Related articles by Zemanta

• Is the GOP Closing the Tech Gap? (blogs.abcnews.com)
• Can Republicans steal Obama’s Web 2.0 mojo? (go.theregister.com)

I just finished reading The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. It was truly energizing.

My senior project for the Ball State Entrepreneurship Program was to write a business plan and pitch it to a board of venture capitalists for approval. I did my plan on creating an Internet Yellow Pages (IYP) company called Munciepages.

John’s book reminded me why I’ve always had this burgeoning feeling about internet search. Google and Yahoo rewrote the rules about search and launched billion dollar companies. But they went about it in two distinctly different ways.

Yahoo was started by David Filo and Jerry Yang as a self-edited guide to the internet, called “Jerry and David’s Guide to the World Wide Web.” John details in the book that Yahoo has always had a human-editing bend on indexing. In stark contrast stands Google. Started by Larry Page and Sergey Brin as a backlink analyzer, their search engine has from day one been based on computer algorithms and advanced engineering.

So what?

Human-editing is impossible to scale indefinitely. And as of yet, computers still can’t provide opinions or process context like humans. Based on Battelle’s analysis I would argue that the perfect search solution would be a combination of the two. And to control the scale issue I think one can look to create a limited scope. Local is the solution.

I truly believe that the next revolution in search will be local. The yellow pages industry is a 15 billion dollar industry. Classified advertising is another 15 billion dollar industry. The business model for local news is dying a quick death. Yet more and more people are turning to the web.

Google, Yahoo, YellowPages.com and the hundreds of other local directory websites are all going about local search the exact same way. They get data from InfoUSA then ask business owners to log in and add advanced data. This doesn’t work. Google and Yahoo can append crawled data to business listings and sites like Yelp.com are empowering consumers to add content. Again, this is not enough.

To get local businesses to shift advertising dollars online I believe that someone is going to have to hold their hand and help them. Prove value first then show them how to make the most out of using the web.

URBaCS will be launching a new solution to solve the local search problem on August 1st. Stay tuned for more information. And thanks John Batelle for reminding me why I spent an entire year of my life researching local search.